Objectivity Is Always Questioned In Pain Studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Objectivity in Historical Studies
Methodological restriction brings in its wake invalidity and objectivity in various branches of human seiences. By study the objections concerning the objectivity in historical studies and historiography and contemporary version of science as the background of such objections makes clear that this version of induction and objectivity mingled with bigoty and exteoimism. As it is conceived no ...
متن کاملPain, objectivity and history: understanding pain stigma.
The primary claim of this paper is that understanding the stigma so commonly endured by chronic pain sufferers today in the USA and the UK is unlikely without proper appreciation of the history of pain. Ameliorating such stigma is an ethical imperative, and yet most approaches eschew even an attempt to trace connections between historical attitudes, practices and beliefs towards pain and the st...
متن کاملGroin pain in sportsmen is not always musculotendinous in origin.
CASE REPORT A 21 year old rugby player presented with bilateral suprapubic tenderness of 10 days duration. It was first noticed after a training session, and despite analgesics and rest had not settled. The term “suprapubic” in this case refers to the region just superior to the pubic symphysis and including the origin of the adductor longus bilaterally. The patient had suffered a similar episo...
متن کاملIs the Detection of Odontoma Always Comfortable? A Case Report
Abstract Odontomas are the most common type of odontogenic tumors, which are often discovered by routine radiographic images or after taking films to determine the main cause of the tooth failure eruption or malocclusion. The present study aimed to describe a case of misdiagnosis and similarity of foreign body density in the radiographic appearance to odontoma in a 13-yea...
متن کاملQuestioned Electronic Documents : Empirical Studies in Authorship Attribution
Forensic analysis of questioned electronic documents is very difficult, because the nature of the documents eliminates many kinds of informative differences. Recent work in authorship attribution demonstrates the practicality of analyzing documents based on authorial style, but the state of the art is confusing. Analyses are difficult to apply, little is known about type or rate of errors, and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Obesity Surgery
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0960-8923,1708-0428
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-019-03725-7